About

Practitioners,not observers.

Our team has spent its careers across the three lines of defense, from controls transformation and ERP implementations to segregation-of-duties analysis and control testing, in Big Four practices and in enterprise controls functions.

The methodology in the product is the methodology we ran.

What we believe

What we are not flexible on.

01

Sign-off belongs to a person

Engines do the work; a named reviewer takes responsibility for it. No screen we ship will blur which of the two happened.

02

Defensibility isn't a feature

If a conclusion can't be traced back to the evidence under it and the person who accepted it, it has no business in a controls program.

03

Nothing starts from a blank page

Matrices, narratives and conflicts are drafted inside the engine that governs them, read from your own processes and configuration, and checked before a reviewer ever opens them.

04

It reads the way your auditor expects

Our libraries and vocabulary follow established methodology, so what comes out of the platform needs no translation for the person reviewing it.

FAQs

The questions we get asked first.

How is this different from a GRC tool?

A GRC tool stores what your team produces — assigns owners, routes evidence, tracks status. Our engines produce the work itself: they draft the RCM, run the SoD analysis, execute the test, assemble the evidence and draft the report, with your team reviewing and signing off at each step.

Do we have to change how our data is formatted?

No. The engines read the process narratives, matrices and access exports you already keep, in the formats you already use them in.

We already have a GRC tool. Should we still consider this?

Most conversations start there. The GRC tool can stay as the system of record; incep2t is the engine that does the design, testing and reporting work that currently gets done by hand and then logged into it.

What do you cover?

Controls and security work across financial, business-process and privacy programs — SOX, ICFR, J-SOX, ERP-transformation projects, GDPR and DPDP — automated on the same engine architecture, one platform per program.

Who reviews and signs off on the output?

Your team, at every stage. The engine drafts the RCM, runs the test and assembles the evidence, but nothing moves forward without a named reviewer approving it first.

How long does setup take?

Within two weeks, a program is set up, integrated with your data, and running: automated and monitored on the platform.