incep2tAI

Executed by Engines. Reviewed by Experts

Internal controls embedded in programs processes & technologies

Executed by Engines. Reviewed by Experts.

incep2t is an AI-powered compliance engine that automates the manual work of running a controls program, scoping, process assessment, the RCM, ITGC, SoD analysis and control testing, and continuously monitors your environment as the business changes, flagging deviations the moment they happen.

Every conclusion is computed by the engine, drafted by agents, and signed off by an expert.

Decades of expertise, operationalized by AI.

Human sign-off enforced at every step SOX · ICFR · J-SOX · ERP · GDPR · DPDP
incep2t / programs / Project Orion Live

Continuous monitoring

J-SOX · Oracle Cloud (Fusion)
Live
Controls monitored142across scopeControls module
Changes detected9last 30 daysChange log
Flagged for review3by materialityImpact engine
Auto-cleared6no material impactImpact engine
ControlChange detectedDetectedStatus
CTRL-AP-014Role change · 3-way match approver2 days agoFlagged
CTRL-OM-003Config change · credit hold threshold5 days agoFlagged
CTRL-FC-007Threshold updated · JE approval limit9 days agoReassessed

Control testing & SoD violation

J-SOX · Oracle Cloud (Fusion) · full population, not a sample
PrintExport
Controls tested96full populationTesting module
Exceptions found4of 96 testedTesting module
SoD rules evaluated214role & access designSoD module
Conflicts flagged12before go-liveSoD module
Roles in conflictSoD rule violatedDetectedSeverity
SOD-014AP Clerk × AP Approver — create & approve vendor invoiceTesting cycle Q3High
SOD-027Buyer × Goods Receiver — create PO & confirm receiptTesting cycle Q3High
SOD-041GL Accountant × JE Approver — post & approve journal entryTesting cycle Q3Medium

Project Orion

J-SOX · Oracle Cloud (Fusion) · Technology
PrintExport
Internal control report 74% Annual assertion on track Computed from controls · testing · findings
Controls in scope96in RCMControls module
Test completion68%65 of 96 testedTesting module
Open deficiencies31 significantDeficiency module
Company-level96100% of populationControls module
Lifecycle progress
01 Scoping & Risk Assessment100%
02 Control Documentation100%
03 Testing & Evidence68%
04 Deficiency & Remediation22%
05 Assertion & Reporting0%
How it's done todayExcel, Word, a shared drive, and static exports from the GRC system of record
01

Consistency depends on who's assigned.

The same method, on the same controls, produces a different conclusion depending on who ran it. There's no way to prove otherwise.

02

No one owns the full picture.

The matrix, the narratives, the IT policies and the access data sit in different files, owned by different people. Nobody can see the whole environment at once.

03

You find out at audit, not before.

Twelve months of activity compress into one review. A control that stopped working in month two surfaces in month twelve, at the worst possible time to fix it.

04

Scope keeps growing. Headcount doesn't.

Every new entity, process or system adds to the workload. The shortfall gets absorbed as unbudgeted consulting spend, year after year.

Scoping_FY26_v3.xlsxExcel
EntityRevenueIn scope?
IN01 Holdings₹1,240 CrYes
SG02 Trading₹310 CrTBC
RCM_FY26_v4_USE-THIS.xlsxExcel
RiskRatingControl
R-O2C-14 Cut-offHigh#REF!
R-O2C-15 CreditMedCTL-RV-018
Evidence/ · 412 itemsShared drive
IMG_2231.pdf
screenshot (3).png
cutoff_review_Aug_final_FINAL.xlsx
test_plans_workbook_v2.xlsxExcel
ControlSampleResult
CTL-RV-02125 of ?Pending
CTL-RV-01825 of 1,840Pass
RE: RE: FW: approval?Inbox

J. Whitaker Fri 18:42

Fine by me. Which file are we signing off on?

Files in play1
Latest versionv2
Carried forward0%
With incep2tOne connected record, start to finish

It reads your financials and works out which accounts are in scope, against a materiality benchmark set once and carried forward.

What used to take weeks of manual assessment now runs in one pass, and nothing gets missed: the duplicate control, the gap a redesign left open, the SoD conflict nobody flagged.

Every piece of support lands directly in the evidence vault, tied to the control it proves, instead of scattered across a shared drive.

Every control is tested against the full population using the evidence already gathered, and the workpaper is drafted from the result, ready for review.

Every report, the audit committee pack, the handover, traces back to the assessment, the controls and the testing behind it, not rebuilt from scratch each cycle.

The reviewer signs what the record already shows, not a summary of it, and that signature is the last manual step in the chain.

SCP-FY26Engine
Order to cash · scoped in
Why it's in4 of 11 entities, above materiality
Reviewed byAwaiting
PA-O2C-14Engine
Process assessment · order to cash
What changed since last cycle3 process updates found
Controls rationalized18 collapsed to 14
Reviewed byAwaiting
EVD-RV-021Engine
Evidence · cut-off review
What was gathered3 items, matched to the control automatically
Reviewed byAwaiting
WKP-RV-021Drafted
Workpaper · cut-off review
What was testedFull population, 1,840 of 1,840
ResultNo exceptions
Reviewed byAwaiting
RPT-AC-Q3Drafted
Audit committee pack · Q3
Built from96 of 96 controls, tested this cycle
Still open3 deficiencies, 1 significant
Reviewed byAwaiting
CTL-RV-021Signed
Cut-off review · concluded
ConclusionEffective
DeficienciesClosed
Reviewed byJ. Whitaker
Signed08 Sep 2026 09:14
ScopeAssessEvidenceTestReportSign
Connected records1
Manual effort removed, upto0%
Carried forward100%
01/06Scope
Why incep2t

Engines, intelligence, and guardrails.

0/3
Before a signature
01

Purpose-built engines

Decades of controls, risk and audit practice, encoded. Every program opens on a designed structure instead of a blank page.

02

The AI works inside them

It reads your framework, your processes and your own systems, so what it drafts is about your organisation, not a template with your name on it.

03

Nothing reaches you unchecked

Every draft is tested against the engine’s own rules before it appears. The model proposes; it never approves. Your team reviews against the evidence, and nothing is final until they sign it.

What it covers

Financial controls. ERP. Privacy programs.

Every regime you answer to, on one connected record: SOX, ICFR, J-SOX, ERP transformations, GDPR, DPDP and more — designed, tested and signed off in the same place.

01ERP transformation

Controls built into the build, not bolted on after.

  • Controls rationalized before go-live, not after
  • SoD conflicts caught before roles reach production
  • Hypercare incidents linked to the control they affect
What you get →
02Financial controls · IFC, ICFR, SOX, J-SOX

A control environment that is audit-ready on day one.

  • RCM rationalized against the live process
  • Testing runs the full population, not a sample
  • Deficiencies tracked to remediation
What you get →
03Privacy & emerging regimes · DPDP, GDPR

Stand up a new regime without starting from a blank page.

  • ROPA drives DPIA, not the other way round
  • DPDP and GDPR scoped to their own obligations
  • Breach, consent and DSR registers on one record
What you get →
Next step

See it run on one of your own processes.

Book a demo